What happens if i kill gil alexander in bioshock 2

Lamb used his guilt to manipulate him into volunteering for an experiment of her own, [10] which she named "the New Utopian project". Based on Jack's mental conditioning as Sofia believed it to be , the subject of the operation would be imbued with the entire collective genius of Rapture via ADAM infusion, suppressing their own personal identity.

Seeing that he was no longer useful to her, Lamb cruelly abandoned him [12] but left him in control of the Fontaine Futuristics headquarters. Post-mutation Gil, now calling himself "Alex the Great", manipulates his surroundings using a modified Security Bot, which he controls via four hijacked Bot Shutdown Panels.

The Bot itself is distinguished by its added television monitor, displaying Gil's manic eyes, and distinctive violet running lights. Alex the Great spends most of his time "running" the Fontaine Futuristics business and manages his spliced "employees" by sadistically punishing them.

Before losing his mind, Gil recorded audio logs with instructions for gaining access to the inner areas of Fontaine Futuristics. In these logs, he also asks anyone who might find them to end his life. However, Alex the Great uses his modified Security Bot and surprisingly operatic singing voice to prevent Delta from accessing the Security Office and, by extension, his hideout.

After destroying all four of Alex's signal relays, the otherwise invulnerable Security Bot is neutralized. Subject Delta is finally able to enter the Security Office, listen to Gil's next message, and unlock the door that leads to the hidden laboratories. After crossing the ocean floor, Delta enters a pitch dark laboratory and finds the scientist in a massive tank for deep sea life.

Another of Gil's old messages instructs him to gather a bunch of plants infused with ADAM , a delicacy that his spliced self cannot resist. Shortly thereafter, a key is printed, allowing Delta to open the hidden doorway behind the Oxy-Fill station outside. You know.

I agree with you, LordXavierBritish, that it's odd that not killing Gil was the choice needed for that achievement. It does seem like a clear-cut mercy killing of someone who asks to die. Also Gil's death doesn't really hurt anyone else in Rapture.

This specific decision reminds me a lot of that Fallout 3 quest-line Oasis. Except agreeing to help Harold die would destroy Oasis while killing Gil actually makes Fontaine Futuristics safer. Seems like a no-brainer. Personally, I saved Grace, killed Gil, and killed Stanley. Luckily, you don't need to save Gil and Stanley to have the "moral" ending. Unlike with Gil, I knew killing Stanley was not what the game considered the moral choice but I was sure that no Big Daddy would ever let a person live that mistreated his Little Sister - even if the mistreatment occurred before she became a Little Sister.

My Delta walked up to Stanley, equipped the shotgun, and Therefore, you kinda HAVE to leave them alive to get it. However, a lot of reports have been coming out about glitched ass achievements. The insane version of him constantly sends alpha series jerkoffs to kill you anyway, and he's annoying as all get out all throughout blocking your way to the Power of the People Machine.

Once the level is mostly complete you have the option to kill him or leave him. He begins to beg for his life on the way out which gave me pause for a second.

I thought, okay this might be the wrong thing to do, but then what sealed the deal was when he madly shouts he'll go outside instead if I let him live! Its like, what kind of life does he have if he lives, right? When Lamb drops this section of rapture or whatever into the Sea wouldn't he die anyway? Unless he can swim?

Now if he was truly serious about going outside, this meat blob abnomination that he is, wouldn't he be considered a sea monster? A mutated thing full of ADAM, set out upon the world? Could he reach the surface? General 1 Answer Is there cross-platform multiplayer? General 3 Answers How do I open the door in the maintenance area? Side Quest 2 Answers. Ask A Question.

Browse More Questions. Keep me logged in on this device. Forgot your username or password? Do as he wishes and put him out of his misery, or let or make? User Info: MetalRay MetalRay 11 years ago 2 [This message was deleted at the request of the original poster] Full videogame playthroughs, all in high quality recorded. User Info: MetalRay MetalRay 11 years ago 3 Even though killing him is good too keeping him alive is also good, but then good as in much better good.

User Info: Tloya Tloya 11 years ago 4 I've heard different reports saying either killing him is the "bad" decision and sparing him is "good," or that this choice has no effect on the game. User Info: thatguy thatguy 11 years ago 7 The "good" choice is to let him live though I disagree with it. User Info: Bopomofo Bopomofo 11 years ago 9 game disagrees, how do you beat its own interpretation? User Info: pokemonmaster0 pokemonmaster0 11 years ago 10 The game rewards you for sparing all of them in form of a achievement However its up to your own ethical morals to decide if it's really right I decided to kill him since it was his last sane wish, and get achievement later only killing him has no effect beyond getting the achievement or not theres no game play effects.